Resolved: Remove LoadString and similar

MikeHart · April 2012

Hi Atilim,

regarding this topic

http://giderosmobile.com/forum/discussion/777/question-about-permission-if-i-create-a-lua-coder-using-loadstring

I had some negative thoughts about it. But it seems that I am overreacting to this. So please ignore this. It is no request after all anymore.

Thanks

avo · April 2012

How much of a risk is it? If something like codea was created how could the apps be compiled to be distributed?

Obviously I'm not very informed on this topic.

MikeHart · April 2012

Online, through the web I guess.

Caroline · April 2012

I'm not informed either - I can't see the risk. Codea have had problems with Apple rejection, so it would be a risk for someone to do the huge amount of work it would need to make a Codea look-a-like.

Wouldn't any code written in the app have to stay inside the app? And even if it were uploaded through the web, it wouldn't work without having Gideros Studio installed.

I'd like to have a Gideros Studio compliant coding app on my iPad, so I can code away from home.

MikeHart · April 2012

So you guys would not be bothered, if someone creates an Codea like app with Gideros and distributes it? For an app like Codea this you just need to create the editor part. All the api of Gideros is available right from the start. The app creator doesn't need to do anything and uses all the hard work that GiderosMobile has done upfront. And remember there is also the Android market where no restriction exist regarding downloading code.

I am extremely bothered with this thought but I am also badly against piracy in total and for others it is perfectly fine. Guess I have different standards.

Caroline · April 2012

I still don't see that it is piracy, but I would like to hear what atilim and gorkem have to say before commenting any more.

I admire your passion, Mike

.

MikeHart · April 2012

Np, I guess I it is all no big deal after all.

avo · April 2012

For me personally it would depend on the intent behind the app itself. If someone created something that basically let you get around using and paying for Gideros obviously that would be bad.

However, if they can only write some code or whatever in the app itself and run it live on their device then I don't think it would be a problem? It would be best if credit was given here as well for the tech in the app.

This actually gave me an idea for a promotional app Gideros could make themselves. If they put out the player onto the app store bundled with some demo code that the user could edit through an interface and see the results live, we could promote that to other developers as an easy way to instantly see how easy/fast Gideros is to use, and how cool the player is for development.

Just a random thought

techdojo · April 2012

There's a reason why the Gideros player isn't available in the app store and it's the same reason why the App Game Kit one wasn't available either.

Instant Apple rejection. Attempting to run code downloaded from outside the sandbox = "not in this life sonny"

Granted Android is a different thing - but then the only functions that would be available would be the existing Gideros ones (which are FREE anyway) so there seems little point

Zoyt · April 2012

I think I'm one if the only other people that could find a threat in that... It's in my plans to create a sandbox of functions to make it a little safer. I can't imagine anyone using an app like that to hack into a device and do things to it, but with Apple, it's better safe than sorry.
Here is my current plan of functions to block:
1. LoadString
2. File I/O
3. Flurry
4. Store kit
5. Some stuff under Application
More functions that won't work or pose a threat? Just LMK. But I guess people do tend to look at the code before running it...
Thanks!
Edit: Oh... And until I add integration, I'll block fonts and texture packs.

OZApps · April 2012

I guess, that firstly if someone would want to create their own SDK, then it would make more sense to create it from scratch than to base it on an existing framework. The highlight (as it has been correctly identified) of Codea is not the lua based scripting ability alone, but the wonderful Editor. Plus on the Apple app store you are faced with instant ban/rejection depending on the extent of the attempt, however on Android you even have AIDE, which is a fully featured android editor, compiler and packager, so you can write code, compile and install it on the device.

@Zoyt, you seem to be an intelligent and smart kid, you have lots of ideas, I would suggest just one thing to you, Focus, You are all over the place. You might not have been born when Java was first released, it was supposed to be a sandbox environment that would not allow access to the file system and run in the browser like an applet. Today it is causing Macs to be used like Bots. The point is that every developer has a different need, and the better frameworks are the ones that let the devs choose not restrict them. So I fail to see the point in your attempts to sandbox that. I know that this is rather funny, if you want a sandboxed, limited API, you can have a look at the Mexican Beer framework. One of the reason that many devs have migrated from there over to here is the ability to do more.

Lastly, if anyone wants to make an app using loadstring, then the best solution is to build your own SDK, lua will execute the code using loadstring, it is all about wrapping OpenGL with lua.

Zoyt · April 2012

Thanks for the advice @OZApps - It's in my plans to just release the source code and get practice making the editor, or ditch it all together. I'll see.

Howdy, Stranger!

Categories

In this Discussion

Top Posters

Resolved: Remove LoadString and similar

Comments

Howdy, Stranger!

Quick Links

Categories

In this Discussion

Top Posters

Resolved: Remove LoadString and similar

Comments